Defenition of carbon 14 dating
A straightforward reading of the Bible describes a 6,000-year-old universe, and because some carbon-14 (C) age estimates are multiple tens of thousands of years, many think that the radiocarbon method has soundly refuted the Bible’s historical accuracy.However, these excessively long ages are easily explained within the biblical worldview, and C should be present in specimens that are even a little more than 100,000 years old!Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.Evolutionists have long used the carbon-14, or radiocarbon, dating technique as a “hammer” to bludgeon Bible-believing Christians.It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years.We will deal with carbon dating first and then with the other dating methods.
Desmond Clark (1979) wrote that were it not for radiocarbon dating, "we would still be foundering in a sea of imprecisions sometime bred of inspired guesswork but more often of imaginative speculation" (Clark, 1979:7).
The amount of Carbon 14 contained in a preserved plant is modeled by the equation $$ f(t) = 10e^.
$$ Time in this equation is measured in years from the moment when the plant dies ($t = 0$) and the amount of Carbon 14 remaining in the preserved plant is measured in micrograms (a microgram is one millionth of a gram).
Libby of the University of Chicago in immediate post-WW2 years.
C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.
The standards do not prescribe that students use or know with log identities, which form the basis for the "take the logarithm of both sides" approach.